Tags:
4.Scenario
Ms. Roy, a 68‐year‐old patient, seeks a second opinion regarding her upper left second premolar (#25). The tooth currently has a post and core restoration. A recent radiograph reveals a cervical radiolucency near the core margin. She reports mild but persistent discomfort, although there is no acute pain, swelling, or obvious sinus tract. Two different dentists have recommended:
- Crown lengthening to expose additional tooth structure and retain the tooth, or
- Extraction due to concerns about future complications.
Ms. Roy has delayed treatment for over a month, hoping to clarify the best long‐term solution. Her medical history includes:
- Type 2 diabetes (well‐managed),
- Osteoporosis managed with denosumab injections,
- Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (on thyroid hormone replacement).
She has no significant financial concerns but wishes to minimize risk and ensure a stable, healthy outcome.
On examination, there is no periodontal mobility or significant pocketing around #25. However, the crown margins are subgingival, and the radiolucency suggests possible microleakage or early caries at the tooth‐restoration interface.
MCQ 4
Which set of investigations most comprehensively guides the final treatment choice (saving #25 vs. extracting)?
Correct Answer: A. Periapical X‐ray, smile line assessment, bone sounding, periodontal probing
Explanations
- A (Periapical X‐ray, smile line assessment, bone sounding, periodontal probing)
- Best Answer.
- A dedicated Periapical X‐ray reveals the post length, any periapical changes, and subgingival caries.
- Smile line assessment helps evaluate aesthetics and how much tooth/gingiva display there is.
- Bone sounding (probing through the gingiva to bone) clarifies the available ferrule length and alveolar crest topography.
- Periodontal probing around all aspects of #25 reveals pocket depths or possible attachment loss.
- Together, these tests provide crucial information on restorability (sufficient tooth structure, any alveolar bone defects) and aesthetic implications of crown lengthening.
- B (Electric pulp testing, transillumination, test cavity, alveolar palpation)
- EPT and transillumination help detect fractures or pulp vitality, but they don’t directly evaluate subgingival margin location or alveolar crest level. A “test cavity through the post” is highly invasive and less practical when a radiolucency is near the cervical margin. Alveolar palpation is not definitive for subgingival caries extent.
- C (Periodontal probing (mid‐buccal only), final shade matching, hand‐mirror test, percussion test)
- Limited probing (mid‐buccal only) is insufficient to reveal deeper problems interproximally. Shade matching and the hand‐mirror test focus on aesthetics, while percussion alone cannot confirm restorable ferrule.
- D (Panoramic X‐ray, endo‐ice thermal test on #25, occlusal load measurement, direct composite patch test)
- A panoramic X‐ray gives a broad overview but lacks the detail of a periapical for subtle cervical issues. Endo‐ice is often blocked by a metal post. Occlusal load measurement and a composite patch test do not assess alveolar crest shape or subgingival margins.
- E (Horizontal bitewing X‐ray, selective anesthesia on #25, tongue retraction test, infiltration with epinephrine)
- A horizontal bitewing may not capture the full apex or show the entire root extent. Selective anesthesia localizes pain but doesn’t clarify vertical or cervical restorability. Tongue retraction test and infiltration with epinephrine do not address subgingival structure or alveolar bone.
Correct Answer: A. Periapical X‐ray, smile line assessment, bone sounding, periodontal probing
Explanations
- A (Periapical X‐ray, smile line assessment, bone sounding, periodontal probing)
- Best Answer.
- A dedicated Periapical X‐ray reveals the post length, any periapical changes, and subgingival caries.
- Smile line assessment helps evaluate aesthetics and how much tooth/gingiva display there is.
- Bone sounding (probing through the gingiva to bone) clarifies the available ferrule length and alveolar crest topography.
- Periodontal probing around all aspects of #25 reveals pocket depths or possible attachment loss.
- Together, these tests provide crucial information on restorability (sufficient tooth structure, any alveolar bone defects) and aesthetic implications of crown lengthening.
- B (Electric pulp testing, transillumination, test cavity, alveolar palpation)
- EPT and transillumination help detect fractures or pulp vitality, but they don’t directly evaluate subgingival margin location or alveolar crest level. A “test cavity through the post” is highly invasive and less practical when a radiolucency is near the cervical margin. Alveolar palpation is not definitive for subgingival caries extent.
- C (Periodontal probing (mid‐buccal only), final shade matching, hand‐mirror test, percussion test)
- Limited probing (mid‐buccal only) is insufficient to reveal deeper problems interproximally. Shade matching and the hand‐mirror test focus on aesthetics, while percussion alone cannot confirm restorable ferrule.
- D (Panoramic X‐ray, endo‐ice thermal test on #25, occlusal load measurement, direct composite patch test)
- A panoramic X‐ray gives a broad overview but lacks the detail of a periapical for subtle cervical issues. Endo‐ice is often blocked by a metal post. Occlusal load measurement and a composite patch test do not assess alveolar crest shape or subgingival margins.
- E (Horizontal bitewing X‐ray, selective anesthesia on #25, tongue retraction test, infiltration with epinephrine)
- A horizontal bitewing may not capture the full apex or show the entire root extent. Selective anesthesia localizes pain but doesn’t clarify vertical or cervical restorability. Tongue retraction test and infiltration with epinephrine do not address subgingival structure or alveolar bone.